Thursday, February 20, 2014

Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Bell v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant sought review of a judgment of the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia), which convicted him of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in Violation of Va. Code § 18.2-266.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The reasonableness of seizures, less intrusive than traditional arrests, depends on a balancing test. The Supreme Court of the United States sets forth three criteria by which the validity of such seizures should be gauged. There must be a weighing of (1) the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure, (2) the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and (3) the severity of the interference with individual liberty. A "central concern" in balancing the foregoing competing considerations has been to make certain that an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy is not subject to arbitrary invasions solely at the unfettered discretion of officers in the field. Thus, the Fourth Amendment requires that a seizure must be based on specific, objective facts indicating that society's legitimate interests require the seizure of the particular individual, or that the seizure must be carried out pursuant to a plan embodying explicit, neutral limitations on the conduct of individual officers.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

0 comments:

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #

Virginia

Fairfax County703-278-0405
Prince William County703-278-0405
Loudoun County703-278-0405
Fredericksburg703-278-0405
Richmond804-201-9009
Virginia
beach
757-512-5002
Lynchburg434-509-4004

Maryland

Rockville240-399-0304
Baltimore240-399-0304
Powered by Blogger.

Social Icons

Popular Posts

Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free