Thursday, February 20, 2014
Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Violation Code 18.2-266
Virginia Traffic
DUI Lawyers Fairfax
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Bell v. Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant sought review of a
judgment of the Circuit Court of Fairfax (Virginia), which convicted him of
driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in Violation of Va. Code § 18.2-266.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- The reasonableness of
seizures, less intrusive than traditional arrests, depends on a balancing
test. The Supreme Court of the United States sets forth three criteria by
which the validity of such seizures should be gauged. There must be a
weighing of (1) the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure,
(2) the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and (3)
the severity of the interference with individual liberty. A "central
concern" in balancing the foregoing competing considerations has been
to make certain that an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy is
not subject to arbitrary invasions solely at the unfettered discretion of
officers in the field. Thus, the Fourth Amendment requires that a seizure
must be based on specific, objective facts indicating that society's
legitimate interests require the seizure of the particular individual, or
that the seizure must be carried out pursuant to a plan embodying
explicit, neutral limitations on the conduct of individual officers.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law
Group. They represent the firm’s
unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.
The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative
content.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Email Us:
Our Phone #
Virginia | |
Fairfax County | 703-278-0405 |
Prince William County | 703-278-0405 |
Loudoun County | 703-278-0405 |
Fredericksburg | 703-278-0405 |
Richmond | 804-201-9009 |
Virginia beach | 757-512-5002 |
Lynchburg | 434-509-4004 |
Maryland | |
Rockville | 240-399-0304 |
Baltimore | 240-399-0304 |
Powered by Blogger.
Popular Posts
-
Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Traffic DUI Lawyers Fairfax Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
0 comments: